MERS IN THE NEWS

Loading...

ARE YOU A VICTIM OF MERS? Headline Animator

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

CONSIDERING FEDERAL AND STATE JUDGES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY ARE ALLOWING THESE SUITS INDICATES THIS DECISION WILL BE REVERSED

Judge dismisses Kentucky county clerks' lawsuit against mortgage industry group MERS

A federal judge in Paducah has dismissed a wide-ranging lawsuit filed by two Kentucky county clerks last year against MERS, the lending industry group that allows mortgages to be traded among investors in the secondary market.

In April, the clerks of Christian and Washington counties sued MERS — Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. — and several banks that are involved in MERS, such as Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase.

But the clerks did not have legal authority to bring the action, according to a ruling Tuesday by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley Jr. of U.S. District Court in Paducah.
The clerks alleged that since the 1990s, MERS has allowed lenders to sell mortgages to investors in the secondary market without properly recording the transfer of ownership in county clerks’ offices throughout Kentucky. The clerks sought class-action status to represent all 120 Kentucky county clerks.

MERS was created by the mortgage banking industry to “(eliminate) the need to prepare and record assignments when trading residential and commercial mortgage loans,” according its website. MERS allows mortgages to be traded among its members while MERS remains the nominee on record in county clerks’ offices.

Earlier this month, Attorney General Jack Conway said he had issued a subpoena to MERS in a separate investigation of whether the industry group violated Kentucky law by avoiding filing mortgage transfers in clerks’ offices.

In the federal case, McKinley ruled that state law regarding the recording of liens in county clerks’ offices is intended to protect land owners, lienholders, prospective buyers and creditors.

But the Kentucky General Assembly has not given clerks a legal avenue to challenge the mortgage industry regarding the recording of assignments and the collection of fees in their offices, the judge wrote.

“Had the General Assembly wanted to allow county clerks to file lawsuits regarding recording fees, it certainly knew how to do so,” McKinley wrote.

“This is a significant and precedent-setting decision for MERS,” said Janis Smith, vice president for corporate communications of Reston, Va.-based MERSCORP, Inc., in a prepared statement.

Reporter Chris Otts can be reached at (502) 582-4589.

SORRY MERS, I'M BETTING THIS WILL BE REVERSED.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

HARRIS COUNTY MAY BE THE LEAD PLAINTIFF IN A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT TAKEN AGAINST MERS ON BEHALF OF ALL 254 TEXAS COUNTIES FOR UNPAID MORTGAGE REGISTRATION FILING FEES

Harris County to sue over mortgage fees

By Mike MorrisHouston and Texas

Harris County Commissioners Court voted Tuesday to sue a mortgage-recording firm the county attorney's office believes owes the county $11 million or more in unpaid filing fees.

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., or MERS, was formed by the mortgage-banking industry to "streamline the mortgage process," its website says. When banks sell mortgage loans to other entities, that transaction generally is recorded with the county clerk and requires a fee.

According to County Attorney Vince Ryan's office, MERS helped banks skirt that process, particularly as Wall Street began pooling thousands of mortgages and selling them to investors.

Ryan plans to hire Malouf & Nockels, the law firm Dallas County has hired to pursue a similar suit. Similar lawsuits have been filed in other states.

Dallas County had requested the suit be certified as a class action on behalf of all 254 Texas counties; Harris County hopes to be the lead plaintiff, Ryan said.

MERS has said its "business model and practices are legal and comply with the recording statutes and regulations of Texas."



Monday, January 23, 2012

Suprised? Top Justice officials connected to mortgage banks.

Insight: Top Justice officials connected to mortgage banks

Related News
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (R) chats with Assistant Attorney General in the criminal division of the Justice Department Lanny Breuer before their testimony on the second day of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington January 14, 2010.     REUTERS/Jason Reed
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (R) chats with Assistant Attorney General in the criminal division of the Justice Department Lanny Breuer before their testimony on the second day of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington January 14, 2010.
Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:31am EST
(Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department's criminal division, were partners for years at a Washington law firm that represented a Who's Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud, a Reuters inquiry shows.
 The firm, Covington & Burling, is one of Washington's biggest white shoe law firms. Law professors and other federal ethics experts said that federal conflict of interest rules required Holder and Breuer to recuse themselves from any Justice Department decisions relating to law firm clients they personally had done work for.

Both the Justice Department and Covington declined to say if either official had personally worked on matters for the big mortgage industry clients. Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said Holder and Breuer had complied fully with conflict of interest regulations, but she declined to say if they had recused themselves from any matters related to the former clients.

Reuters reported in December that under Holder and Breuer, the Justice Department hasn't brought any criminal cases against big banks or other companies involved in mortgage servicing, even though copious evidence has surfaced of apparent criminal violations in foreclosure cases.

The evidence, including records from federal and state courts and local clerks' offices around the country, shows widespread forgery, perjury, obstruction of justice, and illegal foreclosures on the homes of thousands of active-duty military personnel.

In recent weeks the Justice Department has come under renewed pressure from members of Congress, state and local officials and homeowners' lawyers to open a wide-ranging criminal investigation of mortgage servicers, the biggest of which have been Covington clients. So far Justice officials haven't responded publicly to any of the requests.

While Holder and Breuer were partners at Covington, the firm's clients included the four largest U.S. banks - Bank of America, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo & Co - as well as at least one other bank that is among the 10 largest mortgage servicers.

DEFENDER OF FREDDIE
Servicers perform routine mortgage maintenance tasks, including filing foreclosures, on behalf of mortgage owners, usually groups of investors who bought mortgage-backed securities.

Covington represented Freddie Mac, one of the nation's biggest issuers of mortgage backed securities, in enforcement investigations by federal financial regulators.

A particular concern by those pressing for an investigation is Covington's involvement with Virginia-based MERS Corp, which runs a vast computerized registry of mortgages. Little known before the mortgage crisis hit, MERS, which stands for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, has been at the center of complaints about false or erroneous mortgage documents.

Court records show that Covington, in the late 1990s, provided legal opinion letters needed to create MERS on behalf of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and several other large banks. It was meant to speed up registration and transfers of mortgages. By 2010, MERS claimed to own about half of all mortgages in the U.S. -- roughly 60 million loans.

But evidence in numerous state and federal court cases around the country has shown that MERS authorized thousands of bank employees to sign their names as MERS officials. The banks allegedly drew up fake mortgage assignments, making it appear falsely that they had standing to file foreclosures, and then had their own employees sign the documents as MERS "vice presidents" or "assistant secretaries."

Covington in 2004 also wrote a crucial opinion letter commissioned by MERS, providing legal justification for its electronic registry. MERS spokeswoman Karmela Lejarde declined to comment on Covington legal work done for MERS.

It isn't known to what extent if any Covington has continued to represent the banks and other mortgage firms since Holder and Breuer left. Covington declined to respond to questions from Reuters. A Covington spokeswoman said the firm had no comment.

Several lawyers for homeowners have said that even if Holder and Breuer haven't violated any ethics rules, their ties to Covington create an impression of bias toward the firms' clients, especially in the absence of any prosecutions by the Justice Department.

O. Max Gardner III, a lawyer who trains other attorneys to represent homeowners in bankruptcy court foreclosure actions, said he attributes the Justice Department's reluctance to prosecute the banks or their executives to the Obama White House's view that it might harm the economy.

But he said that the background of Holder and Breuer at Covington -- and their failure to act on foreclosure fraud or publicly recuse themselves -- "doesn't pass the smell test."

Federal ethics regulations generally require new government officials to recuse themselves for one year from involvement in matters involving clients they personally had represented at their former law firms. 

President Obama imposed additional restrictions on appointees that essentially extended the ban to two years. For Holder, that ban would have expired in February 2011, and in April for Breuer. Rules also require officials to avoid creating the appearance of a conflict.

Schmaler, the Justice Department spokeswoman, said in an e-mail that "The Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General Breuer have conformed with all financial, legal and ethical obligations under law as well as additional ethical standards set by the Obama Administration."

She said they "routinely consult" the department's ethics officials for guidance. Without offering specifics, Schmaler said they "have recused themselves from matters as required by the law."

Senior government officials often move to big Washington law firms, and lawyers from those firms often move into government posts. But records show that in recent years the traffic between the Justice Department and Covington & Burling has been particularly heavy. In 2010, Holder's deputy chief of staff, John Garland, returned to Covington, as did Steven Fagell, who was Breuer's deputy chief of staff in the criminal division.

The firm has on its web site a page listing its attorneys who are former federal government officials. Covington lists 22 from the Justice Department, and 12 from U.S. Attorneys offices, the Justice Department's local federal prosecutors' offices around the country.

As Reuters reported in 2011, public records show large numbers of mortgage promissory notes with apparently forged endorsements that were submitted as evidence to courts.

There also is evidence of almost routine manufacturing of false mortgage assignments, documents that transfer ownership of mortgages between banks or to groups of investors. In foreclosure actions in courts mortgage assignments are required to show that a bank has the legal right to foreclose.

In an interview in late 2011, Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School who has written about foreclosure practices said, "I think it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history."

Holder has resisted calls for a criminal investigation since October 2010, when evidence of widespread "robo-signing" first surfaced. That involved mortgage servicer employees falsely signing and swearing to massive numbers of affidavits and other foreclosure documents that they had never read or checked for accuracy.

Recent calls for a wide-ranging criminal investigation of the mortgage servicing industry have come from members of Congress, including Senator Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., state officials, and county clerks. In recent months clerks from around the country have examined mortgage and foreclosure records filed with them and reported finding high percentages of apparently fraudulent documents.

On Wednesday, John O'Brien Jr., register of deeds in Salem, Mass., announced that he had sent 31,897 allegedly fraudulent foreclosure-related documents to Holder. O'Brien said he asked for a criminal investigation of servicers and their law firms that had filed the documents because they "show a pattern of fraud," forgery and false notarization.
After reading this article, people also read:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
When I wrote about this last week, I also pointed out the connection between Covington & Burling and the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which was supposed to target the perpetrators of the Financial Meltdown:

James Garland, who joined Justice with Holder but left in 2010: At Justice, Garland
“advised Attorney General Eric Holder on a range of enforcement issues, with an emphasis on criminal…matters, and helped to spearhead the Department’s response to the ongoing economic crisis. He was deeply involved in the creation of President Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force… He worked closely with senior officials at the White House, Main Justice, the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, and other federal, state, and local enforcement agencies.” [Bold added]

NOTE: the bolded language is no longer in Covington’s bio of Garland. But it was when I wrote the piece last February.

Steve Fagell, who joined Justice with Holder but also left in 2010:
“a member of the Criminal Division’s senior leadership team, [and] a key advisor to Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer …[Fagell] was integrally involved, for example, in the formulation and communication of Division policy in connection with…corporate and securities fraud, and other forms of financial fraud.…Mr. Fagell also coordinated the Division’s work with the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission…[Bold added]

And that’s just a piece of the connections between top Justice folks and Covington.
See, our top prosecutor, his top criminal enforcement deputy, and two key architects of Justice’s approach to Financial Meltdown enforcement all worked or now again work for the very people and companies Justice is failing to prosecute. How much of a coincidence can that be?
My full piece is at http://abigailcfield.com/?p=686
Jan 20, 2012 7:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
breezinthru wrote:
At last! For several years, I have been railing about Eric Holder and the Justice Department’s refusal to use RICO laws to prosecute the largest financial fraud in the history of the world. I couldn’t understand how that was possible. A few modest fines by the SEC in this situation was not only a non-punishment; it was an insult to the intelligence of the American public and an insult to the concept of the rule of law in America.
Since 1972, the only time I ever cast a vote for a Republican presidential candidate was in 2008 and Obama had my vote until he and McCain both voted to bail out Wall Street. I ended up voting for Ron Paul.
Obama must demand the resignation of his Attorney General immediately and bring in someone who intends to restore justice and the rule of law to America! If he does, Obama will get my enthusiastic vote. If not, Obama is as culpable for what has been going on as is Dimon and Blankfein.
Jan 20, 2012 8:00am EST  --  Report as abuse
AZWarrior wrote:
It’s the Chicago Way.

Friday, December 30, 2011

WHY IT’S NO COINCIDENCE MORE AMERICANS ARE BEING FORECLOSED UPON THAN ANY TIME SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION

Clouded Title: The Gross Illegality of MERS


Author: Barry Ritholtz · December 28th, 2011
“What’s happened is that, almost overnight, we’ve switched from democracy in real-property recording to oligarchy in real-property recording. There was no court case behind this, no statute from Congress or the state legislatures. It was accomplished in a private corporate decision. The banks just did it.”

Christopher Peterson, a law professor at the University of Utah, on the “wholesale transfer of mortgages to a privatized database” and why it’s no coincidence more Americans are being foreclosed upon than any time since the Great Depression.

The quote above is from an article in the January 2012 Harper’s. It’s ostensibly about the ongoing battle between Homeowners and Bankers (PDF is online at Scribd, Think Tank, but not for long).

The print edition is illustrated with the artwork of Amy Casey (Housing as a Recurring Dream (Nightmare), previously showcased here)

What makes the article so remarkable is it has one of the most powerful anti-MERS arguments I have ever read in the mainstream media. In addition to the quote above, there is this:

At the heart of the clouded-title problem is a Virginia-based company, recently much in the national news, called Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems. MERS was created in 1995 as a privately held venture of the major mortgage-finance operators, chief among them the government-sponsored mortgaging entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Its stated purpose was to manage a confidential electronic registry for the tracking of the sale of mortgage loans between lenders, which could now place loans under MERS’s name to avoid filing the paperwork normally required whenever mortgage assignments changed hands. No longer would the traffickers in mortgages have to document their transactions with county clerks, nor would they have to pay the many and varied courthouse fees for such transactions. Instead, MERS was listed in local recording offices as the “mortgagee of record,” the in-name-only owner, a so-called nominee for the lender, so that MERS would effectively “own” the loan where the public record was concerned, while the lenders traded it back and forth.

This centralized database facilitated the buying and selling of mortgage debt at great speed and greatly reduced cost. It was a key innovation in expediting the packaging of mortgage-backed securities. Soon after the registry launched, in 1999, the Wall Street ratings agencies pronounced the system sound. “The legal mechanism set up to put creditors on notice of a mortgage is valid,” as was “the ability to foreclose,” assured Moody’s. That same year, Lehman Brothers issued the first AAA-rated mortgage-backed security built out of MERS mortgages. By the end of 2002, MERS was registering itself as the owner of 21,000 loans every day. Five years later, at the peak of the housing bubble, MERS registered some two thirds of all home loans in the United States.

Without the efficiencies of MERS there probably would never have been a mortgage-finance bubble.

After the housing market collapsed, however, MERS found itself under attack in courts across the country. MERS had singlehandedly unraveled centuries of precedent in property titling and mortgage recordation, and judges in state appellate and federal bankruptcy courts in more than a dozen jurisdictions—the primary venues where real estate cases are decided— determined that the company did not have the right to foreclose on the mortgages it held.

In 2009, Kansas became one of the first states to have its supreme court rule against MERS. In Landmark National Bank v. Boyd A. Kesler, the court concluded that MERS failed to follow Kansas statute: the company had not publicly recorded the chain of title with the relevant registers of deeds in counties across the state. A mortgage contract, the justices wrote, consists of two documents: the deed of trust, which secures the house as collateral on a loan, and the promissory note, which indebts the borrower to the lender. The two documents were sometimes literally inseparable: under the rules of the paper recording system at county court-houses, they were tied together with a ribbon or seal to be undone only once the note had been paid off. “In the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity,” said the Kansas court, “the mortgage may become unenforceable.”

MERS purported to be the independent entity holding the deed of trust. The note of indebtedness, however, was sold within the MERS system, or “assigned” among various lenders. This was in keeping with MERS’s policy: it was not a bank, made no loans, had no money to lend, and did not collect loan payments. It had no interest in the loan, only in the deed of trust. The company—along with the lenders that had used it to assign ownership of notes—had thus entered into a vexing legal bind. “There is no evidence of record that establishes that MERS either held the promissory note or was given the authority [to] assign the note,” the Kansas court found, quoting a decision from a district court in California. Not only did MERS fail to legally assign the notes, the company presented “no evidence as to who owns the note.”

Similar cases were brought before courts in Idaho, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Utah, and other states. “It appears that every MERS mortgage,” a New York State Supreme Court judge recently told me, “is defective, a piece of crap.” The language in the judgments against MERS became increasingly denunciatory. MERS’s arguments for standing in foreclosure were described as “absurd,” forcing courts to move through “a syntactical fog into an impassable swamp.”

(emphasis added)

I was so thrilled with this piece, I subscribed to Harper’s Magazine thru Amazon ($10)
Source:

Stop payment! A homeowners’ revolt against the banks

Christopher Ketcham

Harpers, January 2012
http://harpers.org/archive/2012/01/0083752
This post originally appeared at The Big Picture and is posted with permission.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

HAVE YOU LOST YOUR HOME TO WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE? HERE IS SOME HOPE.

HOMEOWNERS: DID YOU LOSE YOUR HOME TO WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE? DO YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE A ROBO-SIGNATURE ON YOUR DOCUMENTS?

 If you lost your house in foreclosure or were forced to short sale it because your lender would not work with you... don't give up just yet. If you have a robo-signature by your bank on your loan or a lack of proper paperwork regarding transfer of title by your bank... you definitely have legal options to go after your lender for a wrongful foreclosure. Do any of you feel that you were wrongfully foreclosed upon, and what is your story?

You can call me (Andrew) at 877-400-0219 ext. 301, I can go over exactly what I am talking about and your options. I look forward to speaking with you and hearing your story. Or if your prefer, e-mail Andrew the details of your story. Send him your home's address, city, state, county, the name the title was in, and your phone number.

 GOD BLESS YOU ANDREW!

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

MANY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE FILING SUIT AGAINST MERS

November 28, 2011 from WFAE In the mid-'90s, the big banks set up the Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS, to track mortgages as they're traded by investors in mortgage-backed securities. It's a system set up to let banks skip the process of paying recurring filing fees at county courthouses each time a mortgage was bought or sold. Now, many cash-strapped local governments, big and small, are filing lawsuits against MERS. Politicians contend their communities are owed millions of dollars.


Copyright © 2011 National Public Radio®. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

MELISSA BLOCK, HOST:

Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS, may not be a household name, but perhaps it should be. If you've bought a house or refinanced in the last decade, there's a good chance you signed a document at closing that designates MERS as your new lender. Well, it's now the subject of controversy. Many local governments argue in lawsuits that MERS has enabled the mortgage industry to skip out on paying millions of dollars in recording fees.

Greg Collard, of member station WFAE in Charlotte, reports.

GREG COLLARD, BYLINE: In a simpler time, here's what happened after you bought a house with help from a bank. The mortgage, or deed of trust, would be filed at the county courthouse. So would all future transactions on that mortgage; if another bank bought the loan, for example. A fee was paid each time those transactions were documented at the courthouse. And part of the money went to local governments to help them pay for local services.

But that was before the big banks created MERS about 15 years ago, says Craig Watkins, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas.

CRAIG WATKINS: MERS was created, basically, to avoid having to go through that cumbersome process of making a filing within the local county records, so they can quickly sell these mortgage-backed securities to the different entities.

COLLARD: These days, most of those transactions are tracked in a private MERS database instead of courthouses. Watkins estimates his county has lost up to $100 billion in recording fees. He filed a class-action lawsuit against MERS, and hopes to represent every other Texas county.

Similar lawsuits have also been filed in Florida, Delaware, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Oklahoma.

JANIS SMITH: They're the proverbial thorn in our side, if you will.

COLLARD: Janis Smith is a spokeswoman for MERS. Yes, the system has saved recording fees, she says, but only because MERS has eliminated the need to document every single transaction.

SMITH: So because MERS is the mortgagee, and the lien remains in MERS' name, there's no need for an assignment. So there's nothing to record.

COLLARD: All this might surprise you even if you bought a house or refinanced recently. You probably never heard of MERS. But almost two-thirds of all U.S. mortgages are registered with the private company. Remember that never-ending stack of papers at closing that you sign, date and initial?

SMITH: There's standard, clear language on page one, paragraph one, of the mortgage instrument that names MERS as mortgagee.

COLLARD: And that has led to a mess of the county's land records, says Christopher Peterson. He's a law professor at the University of Utah, and also a consultant in foreclosure cases against MERS.

CHRISTOPHER PETERSON: Now, the public record doesn't reveal who owns loans. Instead, it just says, you know, MERS is the owner. And the county recorders are recording documents that say MERS - over and over and over and over again.

COLLARD: That's certainly the case at the Register of Deeds Office in Cabarrus County. There are lots of big, heavy books that index property transactions dating back to 1792, but one volume easily stands out for its massive size.

LINDA MCABEE: It's just page, you know, after page.

COLLARD: Register of Deeds Linda McAbee flips through the index for every transaction MERS has filed at the courthouse over a five-year period. She has no way of knowing who bought and sold these loans because MERS doesn't update the public record. And McAbee says her county is losing money as a result.

MCABEE: For sure, we did lose some recording fees.

COLLARD: When the economy was strong, McAbee says her office received about $5 million in recording fees each year. Now, that's down to about $2 million. As the housing market continues to sputter, McAbee expects more local governments to take MERS to court to replace some of that lost money.

For NPR News, I'm Greg Collard in Charlotte.

Copyright © 2011 National Public Radio®. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to National Public Radio. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.
Enhanced by Zemanta

MERS: GOOD OR BAD? THE FACT IS, EVERY SITUATION IS DIFFERENT.

Les Kramsky, a Highly Regarded Real Estate Attorney, Discusses MERS

 
 Les Kramsky, who presently serves as the General Counsel to the Money Store, shares his views on the controversy regarding MERS.
 
MARLBORO, N.J., Dec. 19, 2011 /PRNewswire-iReach/ -- Les Kramsky, a highly respected New Jersey and New York Mortgage Banking Attorney, Title Insurance Attorney, Real Estate Executive and General Counsel to the Money Store, discusses the pros and cons of the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems ("MERS").

MERS, based in Reston, Virginia, is a private company, which was founded it in 1995 to speed up legal record-keeping of mortgages and sales of mortgage loans through securitizations.

MERS, on behalf of lenders that own the mortgage loans, has initiated thousands of foreclosure actions around the country, as the "mortgagee of record" listed on homeowners' mortgages. Homeowners' lawyers contend that MERS has no right to initiate the actions because it doesn't own the mortgage loans. Lending laws specify that only the actual owner of the loan can file a foreclosure action. Lawyers also have alleged that MERS bypassed laws requiring mortgages and refinancings to be recorded in county recorders offices. Issues have been raised in several court cases about whether MERS misled courts about ownership of the loans. MERS has strongly denied any misrepresentations or legal violations, and contends that its services have benefited homeowners as well as lenders.

However, the advantages of MERS according to Les Kramsky is "That the MERS system is an innovative process that simplifies the way mortgage ownership and servicing rights are originated, sold and tracked. MERS was created by the real estate finance industry and MERS eliminates the need to prepare and record assignments when trading residential and commercial mortgage loans. This standardization and simplification outweighs any revenue that a municipality might generate from the recording fees if these assignments were to be recorded." Kramsky added "That the MERS system ultimately translates to savings for consumers who will not get hit by added costs from lenders passing on recording fees."

Kramsky further stated "If the current lawsuits force the banks, and MERS, to re-evaluate and improve upon the electronic system, that could ultimately work out better for the industry."

In a recent article that appeared in Law360 regarding MERS, Les Kramsky stated that "It might not be a bad thing for the real estate industry if the MERS sustain can be improved without being dismantled. Like anything else, sometimes you have to tweak the system to make it better."

SEO News distribution by by Press Release Distribution service.

Media Contact: Jason Franco Les Kramsky, (732) 625-9991, les@realestateattorneynj.com

News distributed by PR Newswire iReach: https://ireach.prnewswire.com/

SOURCE Les Kramsky
Back to top
RELATED LINKS
http://www.realestateattorneynj.com/
Enhanced by Zemanta

Add This Sharing Gadget

ADD TO ANY

Share

SPONSORED TWEETS REFERRAL BADGE

SponsoredTweets referral badge

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT WITH GOOGLE AD SENSE!

google-site-verification:F0TQ78N0pgSoPEuw5zRe0D6CXKtheezqJqEBWb8wuQE

Subscribe Now: iheart

I heart FeedBurner

Twitter Updates 2.2: FeedWitter

Twitter Updates 2.2: FeedWitter